Demand responsive driving charges

Also called decongestion charges

Demand responsive driving charges enable people who need to drive, to get where they need to go, without being slowed down by severe traffic congestion. Also called decongestion charges, they work by imposing the smallest possible charge for that time of day, to reduce traffic volumes just enough so that traffic speeds stay high. At off-peak times the charge can be zero, while at peak times the charge can be high.

Benefits

The benefits of demand responsive driving charges are described in:

Or view this introduction:

Support from the Committee for Melbourne

In their report Transporting Melbourne, the Committee for Melbourne recommends road user charges:

The formulation of a new pricing regime will be critical to the challenge of reducing congestion, improving efficiency of the state’s transport network and achieving optimum value-for- money for infrastructure investment. Significant productivity losses and other inefficiencies are expected unless we begin to price our roads adequately.

Transporting Melbourne, from the Committee for Melbourne
Image credit: Committee for Melbourne.

Support from the Grattan Institute

The Grattan Institute recommends imposing congestion charges:

We recommend a three-stage reform: within the next five years, state governments should introduce cordon charging, where drivers pay to cross a boundary into the capital city CBDs in the morning peak and out in the afternoon peak; within the following five years, people should pay to drive along the busiest urban freeways and arterial roads at peak periods; and eventually people should be charged on a per-kilometre basis for driving across the city’s entire road network at the busiest times.

Grattan Institute

Support from the Victorian Government

The Victorian State Government will introduce a Road Occupation Charge for arterial roads across inner Melbourne. At the moment the introduction is deferred owing to COVID-19. The justification for the charge explicitly describes how private parties occupying a road contributes to congestion. At the moment the charge does not apply to vehicles occupying a lane by driving on the lane (and thus delaying other drivers), but in principle could be extended to apply, thus creating a driving charge.

Source: VicRoads

The Road Occupation Charge was trialled in the City of Yarra in 2018, showing that road user charging is effective at changing behaviour:

Source: VicRoads

Support for a road user charge

In a properly functioning economic system, fuel taxes should be considered a charge on motorists for the harmful pollution their vehicles generate. That leaves the problem of paying for roads. To that end, a road-user charge should be applied to all motorists – regardless of the vehicle they drive – so no-one gets a free ride.

John Quiggin, Professor, School of Economics, The University of Queensland

Stop the free ride. Image credit: The Conversation.

It’s ethical to charge to drive on congested streets

It’s ethical for the Victorian State Government to charge to drive on congested streets; and use the revenue to invest in walking, cycling, public transport and car sharing; because it would deliver more mobility for more people. It represents a transfer of wealth and mobility from people on high incomes (who dominate the cohort of people who drive) to people on lower incomes (who dominate the cohort of people who use walking, cycling, public transport and car sharing). For more detail refer to our page on ethics.

Revenue can help provide options

Revenue from demand responsive driving charges is a by-product, as the target is free-flowing traffic. However, revenue can be used to provide people with options to driving, such as safe travel infrastructure for walking, cycling and public transport, including protected intersections and protected public transport stops. As people voluntarily change to other modes, this reduces traffic congestion and works to reduce the demand responsive driving charge.

Conclusion

All Yarra road users, including drivers, will be better off overall if we introduce demand responsive driving charges and use the revenue to invest in infrastructure for walking, cycling, public transport and place making.